Friday, August 22, 2008

U of C ranks #8 in 2009 national listing

U.S. News and World Report published their much anticipated 2009 college and university rankings today. This year, the University of Chicago landed a ranking of eighth best university for undergraduate study--tied with Columbia and Duke. Harvard, Princeton, and Yale once again garnered the list's top three spots.

Both the Report's 2007 and 2008 rankings listed the U of C as #9. The University jumped six spots from #15 in 2006 to #9 in the 2007, after the University began evaluating the Report's ranking methodologies and tracking the way the Report interpreted information about the University.

After the University dropped several ranks over the past several years, University administrators chose to take an increasingly active role in reporting admissions statistics, spending on its undergraduate programs, selectivity, and retention rate.

As part of the University's decision to revamp its reporting procedures, Michael Behnke, vice president for University relations and dean of College enrollment, and several other University administrators visited the magazine's headquarters in Washington, D.C. two years ago.

"In discussing their methodology and some of the ways we were answering the questions, the magazine thought we were misinterpreting some things," Behnke told the MAROON in October 2006.

While many students, parents, and alumni laud the University for its recent efforts to bolster the College's image and raise publicity, the University has come under scrutiny from those wary of current college admissions procedures.

Some have characterized the University's switch to the Common Application as a means of bolstering national rankings by broadening applicant pools and increasing selectivity. Since Zimmer announced the application overhaul, the Facebook groups such as "Save the Uncommon Application" and "The Uncommon Application Appreciation Society" have cropped up on the University of Chicago network in protest of the switch.

In May 2007, the Education Conservancy, a non-profit organization that works to combat what it calls the "commercialization" of the college admissions process, circulated a letter among college and university presidents asking them to refuse to fill out the reputation portion of the U.S. News and World Report questionnaire.

“We believe these rankings are misleading and do not serve well the interests of prospective students in finding a college or university that is well suited to their education beyond high school,” the presidents said in the letter. Among other reasons, they argue that the rankings “encourage wasteful spending and gamesmanship in institutions’ pursuing improved rankings…and overweight the importance of a university’s prestige.”

Although upwards of 60 schools signed onto the letter, University of Chicago President Robert Zimmer refrained from signing.

Nevertheless the University says that the rankings remain a force to be reckoned with for the foreseeable future.

“The rankings are not going to go away, so we’d prefer for them to have accurate information than to go fishing around websites” for data, Behnke said, in a September 2007 MAROON article. “There are some colleges that don’t participate but that are still ranked.”

5 comments:

fortyquestions said...

U of C decided to start gaming the US News ranking system over the last few years and not surprisingly its rankings rose. Penn and Duke did the same thing in the 1990s. The ethics of doing this are debatable. Most importantly, the fact that institutions can game the US News rankings system so easily and effectively by playing around with the numbers they report to US News suggests that US News rankings aren't worth much.

President Zimmer's embracing of US News Rankings for public relations purposes is not exactly a class act. As a mathematician, he certainly knows better.

Anonymous said...

It's in the interests of the administration, the faculty, and the students to boost rankings as it increases their prestige and value of degrees. Can you blame them?

Anonymous said...

President Zimmer's background as a mathemetician is exactly why he knows better. Presuming the data provided to U.S. News is accurate and precise he is doing absoulutely right by the college. If he allowed inaccurate information to be reported or manipulated the information provided to increase the ratings that is irresponsible.

The article also notes upwards of 60 colleges signed a letter refusing to fill out the reputation portion of the U.S. News and World Report questionnaire. How many colleges are in the U.S? I would guess 60 represents less than 10% of the total population of colleges in the country.

fortyquestions said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
fortyquestions said...

I'm not at all a fan of anonymous postings and I don't respond to them. But just to set the facts straight, 46% of those who received the US News reputation survey this year filled it out.

In addition to the survey, US News collects data from institutions on alumni giving, retention, SAT scores, etc. None of this data is vetted and it is very easy to game the system. Add in the fact that US News slightly changes its methodology annually to ensure that the rankings change and you have something that is not worth the paper it's printed on.

Privately, many university presidents will admit that the rankings provided by US News are silly. Not to put words in President Zimmer's mouth, but I'm certain that, given his background, that he would agree that the rankings have no real basis.

But because of their public relations value, college presidents like President Zimmer pretend that the emperor has the finest of clothes. That they do so does not reflect well on the integrity of many college presidents today.